You claim that the relationship between the founders and their ideology is irrelevant; this ideology is the basis for the movement - unless you believe the founders being self-proclaimed "Marxists" is unimportant?
"The BLM organization doesn't support looting and other violent acts"
The argument that there are good and bad "seedlings" in everything is already addressed in the article. I use direct quotations from the leaders of the chapters of BLM and video evidence from a Washington leader wanting to put "police in the grave." Is that peaceful?
BLM has done nothing for me. The organization is disgraceful. I wonder how David Dorn feels about the leaders condoning violence and looting?